While reading, my first thought was the tradition in China to eat chow-chows. I was surprised to find that eating dogs was not entirely rare, and happened in other cultures. However, being a dog owner myself, I knew that I could never actually eat dogs.
What are these goals?
There are undertones of the advertisement that may urge the audience to help end animal abuse or adopt a shelter dog, but the objective of the ad is first and foremost to urge consumers to buy Pedigree dog food.
The commercial is not trying to urge consumers to buy dog food in general. Anyone who owns a dog knows that they must buy some kind of pet food, and those without pets will not be convinced that they need it.
However, Pedigree can make a case for their specific brand. They evidence this claim by detailing the journey of one particular dog that went from an abusive environment to a loving home with the help of Pedigree.
That dog, while very important, is only one of the main figures. The commercial features a series of characters that serve different purposes and evoke different emotions.
We are first introduced to the bad owner, who the audience is supposed to immediately dislike because he is clearly abusive. He is depicted as an angry, abrasive man, who yells at the dog and is uncooperative with the animal rescue workers. This bad owner is offered up as a common enemy to both Pedigree and the audience.
On the other hand, the rescue workers and good owners are shown as strong forces for good. They are gentle and playful with the dog, which appeals them to the audience. More importantly, they seem to implicitly trust Pedigree because they buy Pedigree dog food.
This establishes a credible ethos for Pedigree. Because the rescue workers trust Pedigree, it is implied that regular pet owners should as well. However, there is one character that is more powerful than the others.
The dog is representative of all the rescue dogs that Pedigree has helped.
From the first second of the commercial, the audience is compelled to root for this animal, who appears dirty and miserable, and when the dog is finally welcomed into a new family, clean and healthy, the audience is almost thankful to Pedigree for helping to make it happen.
Of the three settings used, two are particularly powerful. In the opening scenes, the place that the dog is shown in is filthy and bleak.
The weather is gloomy, with gray skies and pouring rain.Rhetorical Analysis from this knowledge I see that his argument of the plants and animals being treated better is backed from his experience that he would not want to eat something that has been treated cruelly. I believe in his mind he sees eating an animal that has been feed and raised in a small cubical that the livestock doesn't have.
Aug 08, · Cue Jonathan Safran Foer’s book, Eating Animals, which raises the question (among many others), “Is the suffering of a drawn-out death something that is cruel to inflict on any animal that can experience it, or just some animals?” (31).
In this article, rhetorical analysis of Internet discussions about health and vegetarianism highlights the argumentative orientation of explanations for meat consumption, with the various. Unlock This Study Guide Now. Start your hour free trial to unlock this 8-page Eating Animals study guide and get instant access to the following.
Analysis; You'll also get access to more than. “An Animal’s Place” Analysis The animal rights movement has grown exponentially in recent years. More and more people are striving to give animals a modicum of the rights which all humans are entitled to.
I think that proves Foer’s point that eating dogs is a tabooed topic in our society. While reading, my first thought was the tradition in China to eat chow-chows. I was surprised to find that eating dogs was not entirely rare, and happened in other cultures.
the more I read the essay, I found myself agreeing and not able to immediately find a.